Professional influence

It’s tempting to act “cool” to fit in, but I advise you to focus on building credibility, helping colleagues and owning your strengths; at Your Career Place I explain how small acts — asking for input, taking clear notes — grow your influence more than posturing. Read more in this piece: Expert advises against trying to be ‘cool’ at work. I write at Your Career Place to help you turn authenticity into career progress.

Key Takeaways:

• Stop trying to be “cool” and focus on building credibility and connections — do small, helpful things (take meeting notes, help a coworker) that add real value. At Your Career Place we see steady helpfulness grow influence more than posturing.
• Be authentic and ask for help: small requests or quick chats open doors to collaboration and trust. Your Career Place suggests using brief moments (elevator, Slack voice memo) to start those conversations.
• Follow your strengths and passions rather than copying popular colleagues; owning your choices and caring about people and quality will naturally make you stand out.

The Futility of Pursuing “Coolness” in Professional Settings

Trying to manufacture a persona drains time and dilutes the one currency that actually matters at work: credibility. I see people spend hours sculpting LinkedIn posts or rehearsing an “edgy” line for meetings, while the tangible actions that build influence — taking notes, volunteering to synthesize meeting outcomes, or helping a colleague refine a slide deck — get pushed aside. A June 2025 marketing study even shows people labeled as “good” are viewed as calmer and more competent than those judged merely “cool,” so the payoff for posturing is often lower than you expect. At Your Career Place I advise clients to convert that energy into repeatable behaviors that colleagues notice and rely on.

Social proof like likes and follower counts can feel validating, but they rarely translate into sponsorship or stretch assignments inside your company. I recommend tracking activities that produce measurable returns: number of 1:1s held each month, projects supported, or process improvements suggested. Those metrics correlate with influence in ways that a carefully curated persona does not, and they let you build a professional reputation that survives reorganizations and changing trends.

The Psychological Costs of Trying to Be Cool

A persistent focus on appearing “on brand” elevates anxiety and fosters imposter-like behaviors. I work with young professionals who report spending 3–6 hours weekly aligning their language and social posts to perceived influencers; that’s time stolen from skill development or relationship-building. The cognitive load of monitoring others’ reactions — constantly editing jokes, rehearsing comments, or gauging which slang to use — reduces working memory available for real problem solving and can erode your confidence over months.

Over time you risk emotional exhaustion and a brittle identity tied to external approval. I coached one junior analyst who traded weekly content-curation for mentoring sessions and learning a new tool; within six months they were on a higher-impact project and felt less anxious in meetings. Swapping performative efforts for concrete investments in your competence yields both better psychological health and clearer career momentum, something I emphasize at Your Career Place.

Social Dynamics: Misreading Workplace Norms

Copying a popular colleague’s style often backfires because workplace norms are context-specific. I’ve seen people mimic a manager’s sarcastic tone or an influencer’s casual sign-off and end up confusing clients or alienating peers; an offhand phrase that landed well in one team can undermine trust in another. Influence grows from patterns people can predict and depend on — punctuality, follow-through, helpfulness — not from intermittent displays of “cool.”

Young workers especially fall into the trap of conflating external applause with internal influence: a LinkedIn post that gets 500 likes may boost your ego but won’t get you invited to a high-stakes meeting. I encourage testing norms with low-cost experiments — offer to take notes for a meeting, send a brief voice memo over Slack, or ask a peer for their take — and observe responses before shifting your behavior more broadly.

Concrete signals matter: consistent, small acts of competence and cooperation build reputational capital faster than dramatic gestures. Use Matt Abrahams’ listening tactic — ask a focused question that invites collaboration — and measure how often colleagues follow up. Those interactions convert into recommendations, mentorship, and responsibilities; that’s the influence you want, not the fleeting glow of seeming “cool.”

Cultivating Authentic Relationships: The Foundation of Influence

I focus on relationships as the bedrock of influence because credibility and connections win more than performance theater. Instead of chasing a curated image, I recommend small, consistent behaviors: take meeting notes, volunteer to prep a colleague’s slide deck, or follow up with a short summary after a conversation. Those actions add tangible value and align with Henna Pryor’s point that ownership and genuine contribution make you more effective than trying to look cool. At Your Career Place I’ve seen employees who adopt this steady, helpful approach outpace colleagues who prioritize image over substance.

Trust compounds over time when you make transparency a habit rather than a headline move. Share realistic timelines, flag risks early, and openly admit when you don’t have the answer—then follow up with next steps. That kind of clarity reduces friction, prevents duplicated effort, and signals you’re easy to partner with, which research and leaders like Matt Abrahams say strengthens long-term collaboration.

Building Trust Through Transparency

I build trust by being explicit about scope and capacity: I tell people what I can deliver, by when, and what I need from them to hit the mark. When I own a mistake, I describe what happened, what I’ll do to fix it, and how I’ll prevent it next time; that three-part format prevents defensiveness and keeps projects moving. Small practices—publishing a one-paragraph meeting recap, or tagging stakeholders in a short action list on Slack—stop assumptions from becoming problems.

Saying no strategically is another transparency move that pays dividends. I teach clients at Your Career Place to reframe refusals around constraints and alternatives—“I can’t lead that project this quarter, but I can help identify a handoff plan by Friday.” That kind of answer protects your bandwidth while signaling reliability, and people start to trust your commitments precisely because they’re realistic and consistent.

Active Listening: The Key to Genuine Engagement

I use active listening to turn conversations into collaboration; it’s more than quiet attention. Paraphrasing someone’s point in two sentences, naming the emotion behind a concern, and asking one focused follow-up question are habits I practice in every 1:1. Matt Abrahams captured this when he said listening shows the other person you’re here—those signals convert casual acquaintances into allies who want to solve problems with you.

Practical routines make listening measurable: I close my laptop in meetings, take handwritten notes, and follow up with a one-line summary and next step. In coaching sessions at Your Career Place I’ve run listening drills where participants track the number of clarifying questions they ask; within a month teams report fewer misunderstandings and faster alignment, because listening reduces rework and builds psychological safety.

To deepen your listening practice, try a simple script: reflect back the speaker’s main point in one sentence, ask “What would success look like here?” and then offer one concrete way you can help. Avoid offering solutions before you’ve paraphrased; that pause gives you better data and signals respect, which makes people more likely to collaborate with you on the next project.

Strategic Decision-Making: Shaping Perceptions and Influence

Strategic choices signal who you are more reliably than any attempt to look cool; volunteering to take notes, synthesize action items, or own the follow-up turns invisible work into visible credibility. I advise keeping a simple log of 6–8 contributions over a three-month window so you can point to concrete impact in performance conversations rather than impressions; that record often matters more than trying to emulate a popular colleague’s style.

At Your Career Place I coach clients to use three quick filters before acting: what value this creates, who benefits, and how I’ll measure follow-through. Decisions rooted in your strengths and passions—Henna Pryor’s approach—tend to be repeatable and recognizable, which builds influence over time because people learn to predict and rely on your judgment.

The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership

I use emotional intelligence to shape how a decision lands: reading the room, naming emotions, and adjusting tone frequently avoids defensiveness and speeds buy-in. Matt Abrahams told CNBC Make It in September 2024 that listening shows you’re present; I pair active listening with a 15-minute pre-announcement 1:1 with the three most affected stakeholders so concerns surface before public rollout.

Practical EQ tactics work: mirror language to validate a concern, ask one open question that invites alternatives, and summarize back the trade-offs you heard. A June 2025 marketing study found people seen as calmer and more conscientious are judged more competent than those perceived as merely “cool,” so managing emotional cues isn’t soft skill theater—it changes how colleagues interpret your competence.

Making Decisions that Align with Team Values

Decisions that visibly reflect team values convert to influence because they make your motives predictable and your follow-through credible. I recommend a five-point rubric mapping each option against the team’s top three values—each stakeholder scores 1–5, we average the totals, and options that clear a predetermined threshold get prioritized; that transparency reduces accusations of posturing.

Clear communication about trade-offs finishes the job: explain the decision in two bullets—impact and alignment—and attach one metric or milestone for follow-up. In one engagement with a mid-size SaaS team I worked with, prioritizing a high-frequency bug fix over a cosmetic feature and framing it as “improves retention and honors our customer-first value” turned initial resistance into cross-functional support.

More detail on alignment: I walk teams through a four-step decision memo at Your Career Place—1) list the top 3 team values, 2) score each option on a 1–5 alignment scale, 3) document who benefits and who bears the cost, 4) name a 30/60/90-day follow-up metric—then circulate that one-page memo before finalizing; that process creates a paper trail of intent and makes your choices defensible and influential.

The Art of Effective Communication: Connecting Beyond Superficiality

Tailoring Messages to Diverse Audiences

Different stakeholders respond to different signals: executives want the bottom-line impact, technical teams want specification and trade-offs, and peers often want to know how collaboration will affect their workload. I coach people at Your Career Place to prepare a one-line hook, two supporting facts, and a clear ask before any meeting — that structure helps you switch tone on the fly and keeps you from posturing. Matt Abrahams’ advice about listening applies here too: invite a quick reaction after your hook so the other person feels consulted rather than sold to.

In practice, I map audiences into three personas: decision-makers, implementers, and influencers. For decision-makers I lead with outcomes and risk mitigation; for implementers I show concrete steps and timelines; for influencers I call out opportunities to co-own success. Henna Pryor’s point about ownership applies: if you tailor messages around people’s natural strengths and priorities, you build credibility faster than trying to look “cool” in front of everyone.

The Power of Storytelling in Professional Environments

Stories convert abstract metrics into human consequences, so I frame data around a single customer or team scenario whenever possible. In one coaching engagement I guided a product lead to replace a slide full of charts with a 90-second user vignette plus two KPIs; that shift changed a skeptical sponsor into an active supporter during the next review. The June 2025 marketing study that contrasted “good” versus “cool” behaviors reinforces this: people perceive calm, conscientious storytellers as easier to work with than those who rely on flash.

Simple narrative templates work well: set the scene (one sentence), present the friction (one sentence), show the impact with a metric (one line), and end with a clear next step. I often recommend rehearsing that 45–90 second story aloud — on a call or in the elevator — so you can deliver it naturally and then follow Abrahams’ playbook by asking a question that invites collaboration.

More detail: craft stories that highlight ownership and contribution, not personality theater; for example, tell how a small change you suggested prevented a launch delay, cite the time saved or error reduced, and name the teammate who collaborated — that combination signals competence, reliability and respect, which aligns with the influence-building advice we give at Your Career Place.

Building a Reputation for Reliability and Competence

I prioritize small, repeatable behaviors that stack into a reputation: arriving five minutes early, circulating a one-page meeting pre-read 24 hours ahead, and closing action items within the agreed window. I tell people at Your Career Place to treat every commitment like a mini project with a clear deadline and owner; tracking those in a simple spreadsheet or task board turns softness around promises into hard evidence of delivery. Teams I coach who adopt that discipline typically cut their missed-deadline rate in half within two quarters and see fewer fire-drills, which directly translates into more influence because people learn they can count on you.

Reliability buys you the right to be heard. I coach clients to measure and report a handful of outcomes — on-time delivery rate, client satisfaction scores, or number of escalations — and to share those metrics quarterly with stakeholders. Concrete numbers change conversations: a jump from 72% to 92% on-time delivery shifts your reputation from “well-meaning” to “dependable,” and that shift makes leaders more likely to give you stretch assignments and a seat at decision-making tables.

Consistency as a Tool for Influence

Daily habits create the expectation that you’ll follow through. I recommend two simple practices: send a brief pre-read at least 24 hours before meetings, and publish a 48-hour action-summary after meetings with owners and deadlines. In one team I worked with, adopting those two steps reduced duplicate work by roughly 30% and cut meeting length by an average of 12 minutes—small wins that compound into tangible credibility.

Track one personal KPI and share it. I track my own on-time completion percentage and encourage clients to do the same: aim for a visible metric you can improve by 10–20% each quarter. The June 2025 marketing study that highlighted how “good people” are seen as calmer and more conscientious echoes this—consistency signals competence, and competence makes people more willing to collaborate with you instead of around you.

Leveraging Successes to Enhance Credibility

Document wins in outcome-focused terms: the problem, your action, and the measurable result. I tell people at Your Career Place to keep an “impact log” where every entry answers three questions — what changed, by how much, and who benefited. One client used that log to compile six months of metrics (reduced error rate by 22%, cut turnaround time from 5 days to 2) and turned it into a two-slide update for their manager that directly led to a promotion conversation.

Share wins strategically so they reinforce your reliability rather than just your ego. I coach people to attribute success to collaborators, tie the result to a business metric (revenue, time saved, error reduction), and include a forward-looking ask—whether that’s a request to lead the next phase or resources to scale the solution. A concise template I use: “Situation → Action → Outcome (with metric) → Ask.” That structure keeps your updates brief, evidence-based, and actionable.

Package successes visually and practice a 30-second summary. Use one before/after chart or two bullet metrics (percent change and absolute impact), and rehearse a tight narrative that fits a quick team update or weekly digest. At Your Career Place I provide clients with a one-page impact template—two bullets for outcomes, one sentence crediting the team, and one clear next step—which helps you communicate wins without sounding like you’re chasing praise.

Conclusion

On the whole, I believe trying to be “cool” at work diverts your energy from what actually builds influence: credibility, connections and consistent value-added contributions. At Your Career Place I urge you to shift attention from image management to actions that matter — showing up prepared, helping a colleague, and following your natural strengths — and you can see this perspective reinforced in Stop Trying to Be ‘Cool’ at Work – Simranjot Singh.

I recommend you practice authenticity and small, steady behaviors: ask for input, listen actively, offer help, and take ownership of tasks. I’ve seen at Your Career Place that these simple, reliable moves build trust and influence far more effectively than posturing, and if you commit to them your reputation and opportunities will grow naturally.

Thank you for visiting Your Career Place. Here are some additional articles.

https://yourcareerplace.com/one-word-that-instantly-kills-your-credibility/

https://yourcareerplace.com/5-strategies-to-advance-your-career/